January 15, 2017
in reply to
Atasa_1512
There could be a number of reasons that older teens are left without sponsors. There were several children that would have effectively been left without a sponsor because their sponsor was older and passed away before they graduated the program; however, she had made provisions for her kids' fees and found sponsors willing to continue writing to the children in the event of her passing. There are also sponsors who've dropped kids because they didn't feel a connection to them or the child became pregnant or dropped out of school. If the child wasn't actually going to escape poverty, the sponsor felt it wasn't a good use of their money anymore.
I think CI told us that something like 18% of sponsors write to their kids (I could have this confused with the number of multiple child sponsors though). For the rest, it's effectively a tax donation that comes with some cute pictures and letters occasionally. Which seems crazy to those of us who write, especially after visiting and learning first-hand how valued the letters are and how special the kids feel when they have an active sponsor. But for tax donation sponsors, ending a sponsorship for financial reasons or because they're retiring or they've had another child, etc, etc probably doesn't carry any specific thought of "what will the child think when I quit?" or that it may be more difficult for the child to find a new sponsor as a teen.
Those are likely reasons for active sponsors too. If you start sponsoring when a child is young, depending on your relative age, having a child of your own could impact finances, suffering an unexpected accident or injury that reduces family income, your spouse dying or being injured or becoming ill, reaching retirement age or being pushed into early retirement, etc. I think it is difficult for people who start sponsoring young children to see it in the context of a commitment for up to 17 years (for a 2 year old) and to plan accordingly. For example, I know that I will stop sponsoring young children when I am elderly and it seems highly probable that I couldn't give them 17 more years. But, I didn't think this way until I lost two children after a bad car accident left me on disability and then unemployment for a total of 9 months. At 23 years old, it simply hadn't occurred to me that I could suffer such a drastic loss of income. Now, as a financial controller, I only sponsor the number of children that I could afford on disability or unemployment. I don't consider either one likely, but I want to be certain that I can at least keep my sponsorships, even if EGs were no longer possible.
Delete
If you want to permanently delete this reply, click the delete button.
There was an error processing your request.